piapia123
en

Simplified ⇄ Traditional Chinese

Text

Everything runs locally in your browser — nothing is uploaded

Input
Output

Simplified and traditional Chinese are not a one-to-one mapping. A single simplified character can stand for several traditional ones, and which is correct depends on the word: the character meaning "to develop" is not the one meaning "hair", even though simplified text writes both the same way. This tool replaces common words whole first, then falls back to the most widely used character form for whatever is left. Treat the output as a solid draft that still needs a read-through; the limitations are listed below.

Features

  • Converts in both directions: simplified to traditional and back
  • Word table first, so characters with several traditional forms land on the right one inside common words
  • Character table as a fallback, always taking the most widely used form
  • Text outside the tables passes through untouched, including punctuation and Latin words
  • Asymmetric mappings handled in one direction only, so a character shared by several meanings survives a round trip
  • Covers the frequent one-to-many words such as hair, cadre, clean, Taiwan, typhoon, calendar and complex

How to use

  1. Pick a direction
  2. Paste your text — the conversion updates as you type
  3. Read through the characters that have more than one traditional form

FAQ

Is the conversion exact?
No, and no tool can honestly claim otherwise. Simplified and traditional are not one-to-one: one simplified character can map to several traditional characters and the right choice depends on the word. Without context analysis an algorithm cannot get every case right. This tool uses the usual word-first approach — good enough for drafts, but always review anything formal.
Which characters are most likely to come out wrong?
The ones with several traditional forms: the characters behind "develop" versus "hair", "cadre" versus "clean", "afterwards" versus "queen", or the ones in "Taiwan" versus "typhoon". Common words containing them are covered by the word table, but names, places and brand names may still be wrong.
Is traditional to simplified more accurate?
Usually yes, because merging several traditional characters into one simplified character removes most of the ambiguity. There are exceptions: the particle written as a distinct character in traditional text shares its simplified form with the verb "to write", and the tool cannot tell them apart.
Which regional variant is used?
One common form only. Regional differences in characters are not distinguished, and vocabulary differences are not handled at all — this tool converts characters, not word choices.

Related tools